Sunday, 19 October 2014

Runaway global warming is essential to save the planet

Lets just assume for the sake of this idea that the theory of climate change is perfect and the effects of not doing anything about it will cause runaway climate change.

We hear you, that is a big ask, despite the whole world believing in it as an article of fear and blind faith. Lets just go with it for the sake of this idea.

Then consider Consensus Reality, the inanimate spirit of civilisation. The general belief by the most people about what reality actually is in terms of the most important factors of life. Its not the whole of reality. It is what most people believe is true unencumbered by fights over political, religious or ideological beliefs.

Today, the greens have done a brilliant job, using fear and end of time scenarios to convince consensus reality that the world  will end by global warming if we do not stop growing our children, our economy, our creativity and our imaginations. The primary goal of The Greens is to turn the world into armies of the walking dead. Zombies with no will to explore the limits of the universe.

Everyone now believes the world will end if we do not stop growing humanity - thanks to The Greens.

This is a terrible mistake we must thank them for.

Look around and see how there is no driving force, no necessity that produces a mother of invention remaining in the spirit of humanity. To all inents and purpose it might as well be dead. And whats the point in life without that spirit.

The only way the spiritual phoenix has ever been revived in the armies of the walking dead, is an immediate existential threat to their dead spirit.

So if consensus reality chooses to regress itself by morbid green ideology, that life threatening event will never happen. Humanity will not evolve. As if saying:

"House prices are too high. So we need to bring down the economy to make them cheaper"

This is a classic psychological case history for a psychotic refusing to address root cause by looking in the mirror.

But if we let go of our fear of death, by letting the dead bury their dead, planetary existence will be genuinely experience the threatened authentically and that will trigger the crucifixion and reincarnation of something rather important.

The Phoenix will rise again with authenticity. And humanity will move right on over what we used to think was the final frontier with confidence dealing with every obstacle in our path, just like any hero heading off for adventure.

Reborn, we will live again. But the greens do not want the people to experience life or for life to be found on earth.

What is MeltFund?
Contact MeltFund 

Saturday, 18 October 2014

Capitalism has a natural negative feedback loop. A very positive thing

The planet saver complains about the capitalist. Because he is "speculating".

The planet saver presumes that all speculation is bad or that speculation is bad in itself. But an inanimate function is neither good nor bad in itself. It just is and the outcome is what we make of it.

So where is the unbounded ignorance of the planet saver suffering confusion this time?

In economics there are 2 general classes of assets that can be speculated in:
  1. Assets which have positive cost of production - anything involving the investment of labour and existing capital
  2. Assets which have zero cost of production - any derivative of an economic rent
The one has a built in negative feedback or lets say a negative coefficient. So the more speculation in it, the more its price will be competed away to the margin of further exchanges - its true price will be discovered the more speculation is allowed to operate on it the more quickly. Surely this is a good thing - the market free'd up to its upper extent makes everything as cheap as possible in the fastest time.

The other has a built in positive feedback or lets say a positive coefficient. So the more speculation in it, the more its price will diverge and form a bubble until eventually bursting - the price will keep rising until no one can afford it any more and the market for it will inevitably collapse - the market effectively closed to free exchanges making everything more expensive and the quality of the thing being exchanged lowered to equalise that loss, and ultimately a total loss.

So the revelation in this economics 101 is that speculation is a fantastic thing for price discovery in a natural market for produced goods and services in the course of exchange. But is a monstrous leviathan in a closed market of trading economic rents for things where no work and enterprise is involved yet there is enormous profit.

What the planet saver does not affirm due to being too busy "helping", is that the latter positive feedback loop is how the economies of all nations operate today - the free market is great, but such a market has yet to be found - the capitalist is great, but show me a true capitalist.

Thus the world needs to adopt an approach of modern systemic slavery to mitigate all the losses. Regulation, Welfare, Benefit Scrounging on all levels, Taxation, Charity, Philanthropy, Organised Religion - all profoundly unjust institutions.

Where if the market were freed up and nature were allowed to run her course, these seemingly virtuous institutions would be seen for what the really are - inherently corrupt, so immediately abolished.

Because consensus reality is "too busy to think" this will never happen, yet we will keep blaming the capitalism straw man. The irony of ironies is when this is pointed out to the proud self confessed capitalist and libertarian. All of a sudden they will start to talk like a socialist. Fascinating denial psychology.

And so it goes...

What is MeltFund?
Contact MeltFund 

Wednesday, 15 October 2014

Taxation is profoundly unjust. Your moral obligation is to evade it

That is, not to avoid tax as a first duty to the future of our children, is immoral.

To make every attempt to evade tax is your natural right. You were born with the inner spirit to fight against injustice.

The fiscal system may well be bound up in the law of every nation. So can you see now that the law is by no means justice, in itself.

Evading tax may well be illegal. But it is not unjust. It is just against the law. And the law is only a piece of paper used to punish those who refuse to be robbed by a vested interest.

If taxation is unjust it is your duty by all means to have the law changed and tax abolished. You do not need to obey the law in that process if the law in itself is unjust.

Taxation is the basis of every economy in the modern world. Therefore every economy is being operated unjustly. Therefore every economy is unsustainable. And set up for periodic failure from the start.

Ignore the law abiding citizen. They are slaves to taxation and injustice. Your are born free from slavery. Only when you start paying tax do you become a slave.

Taxation is the root of unemployment and failed enterprise across the world without exception. Thus it is the root of poverty and homelessness.

So break the law if your motivation is justice. MeltFund will be right behind you.

What is MeltFund?
Contact MeltFund 

Think you have a right to a job? Then you are still a slave

Is there anywhere in nature that gives you rights to employment?

Stranded alone on a desert island do you need this right to start work finding food?

So why do people in general think that corporations must by rights provide jobs?

And then if for whatever reason they cannot without bankrupting themselves, why do people think that government must fund job creation from tax payer's hard earned (which will make work elsewhere EVEN harder to find)

People think these things because the people in general still prefer slavery instead of freedom.

People still want to be provided for by some great master, for all their daily needs.

Does this sound too astonishing?

Everywhere in society today, across the world, the entire system is governed by protectionism. Where the people are protected from themselves by the system. Anything which helps the individual avoid adopting his own obligations in life.

And this is what everyone willingly votes for in general. Slavery. No one is yet voting to abolish slavery even with the 'holy grail' of democracy.

In fact democracy seems to be helping to maintain slavery even more intensely than old.

What is MeltFund?
Contact MeltFund 

Tuesday, 14 October 2014

Its not the bankers. Its homeowners. All 23 million of them

People just cannot understand the problem is home owners. An interesting collective neurosis.

The blame must be cast on the bankers by the consensus. The really interesting ones blame "corrupt democracy" as if that were an evil living spirit. Democracy is the collection of all the complicit individual votes. If it is corrupt, every voter is corrupt by definition.

And others go even further and blame government. But government is not real. At best its yet another created demon in the psyche of the collective in denial. Government is the spokesman for the complicit individual voters. It would not be there if the majority of individuals had not asked for it.

But evil bankers, satanic democracy and tyrannical government are merely supplying home owners the drugs they keep asking for and gobble up by free choice.

The drug taken by most people is The Mortgage. The mortgage is 90% of all money brought into circulation. A banks largest business by a very long way.

Mum and Dad take the mortgage drug in copious quantity. In the hope that one day they will reach that Altered State known in fantasy as

     "the free unearned income from rising house price"

And spend 20 odd years spending most of their time teaching their children an most of their money having them educated into how to get it, despite the gamble and risk to them only likely to secure it to 5% of the people in general.

Yes, of course, "we all need a home to live in". So show us a single occasion in all of history in general where the people have voted to give the increase in property price back to those who created the extra value?

This is not just a UK phenomenon. The whole world today is addicted to the mortgage drug. The mortgage is a globalised drug, all perfectly legal and regulated by government of all party's. Even the tyrant will supply it.

True, The Mortgage is a giant legalised Ponzi scheme run by banks. A pyramid sale that democracy fully endorses. So what! Show us any Mum or Dad who was forced to sign their mortgage contract.

A contract is an agreement between 2 consenting parties. If either side does not want it, the contract does not go ahead and the new money is not created for the loan.

So without the mortgage what profit in money creation would there be for banks? Would banks still find value in casino finance if the home owner were unable to gamble at the alter or home ownership?

We hear you. This idea is extraordinarily difficult for a member of the consensus to believe.

But is it untrue?

Consensus reality is the belief system of the most people regardless of political persuasion or religion - the unconscious irrational psyche of the people. This consensus reality includes all the campaigns to save the world in all their forms, not matter how virtuous and noble they appear to be.

When the messenger comes along and says...

"Look at all this. Its true, isn't it. Why not find a quiet moment to consider what it means to you as a person."

... the most hated enemies, particularly the ones claiming to be saving the planet, will close ranks to have the messenger silenced at all costs.

This collective insanity is great for our valued Clients. By it, they are guaranteed to remain minted. Forever.

What is MeltFund?
Contact MeltFund 

Sunday, 12 October 2014

Richard Dawkins - "The answer is no. Now what is your question"

Richard Dawkins is a believer in irrational dogmatic belief as much as an ISIS freedom fighter. Everything he thinks he knows is just a belief.

A belief is any idea formed when looking at something through a prejudicial lens.

When that belief becomes attached to the persons ego, he wears it as a mask, their persona, as if that where the whole of reality.

That person is now suffering from a neurosis - they are now divided from their whole self due to the attached belief, and harming themselves. This is generally the cause of most illness particularly the chronic kinds.

When the belief becomes concreted into the psyche of that person with steel reinforcement, they are now so divided from reality they are what the law would define as psychotic. They are now in grave danger of acute life threatening disease, not to mention quite willing to harm others without limit.

Einstein had this problem with "spooky action at a distance" in his battle with Niels Bohr. An a-causal connecting principle proven empirically with quantum enstranglement. Yet despite new science moving the world onto new ground beyond relativity, once progress in itself, Einstein was determined to show that material cause and effect remained all that made up reality. He was attached to an outdated belief. What better expression of that neurosis but superstition!

Psychologist Carl Jung along with Wolfgang Pauli, another initiator of the quantum, also had a great battle with Sigmund Freud with the idea of 'synchronicity' which had clear empirical proof in astrology, ESP and Telekinesis, contrary to Freud who believed humans were essentially just machines. Freud's psychological theories remain in the ascendant today.

Richard Dawkins has the same problem when talking about the same kind of things - that life 'boots itself up' and evolves by chance. Material cause and effect are the clockmakers and the only real world is the literal one detectable by the 5 sense organs. Here is a dialogue we have with him:

We have an idea that will be difficult for you
Do not worry
Give it a try anyway
If you do not like it then go back to your old idea no harm done
But if you like it then isn't that great for you
The idea is that the literal world is not the whole of reality
And that humanity is not inherently rational either
And that is OK

Richard Dawkins is not willing to consider a new idea without prejudice - that we might have another 'organ', a 6th one that 'knows'. Yet he claims to be a scientist! He thinks he is doing it without prejudice. But observe him carefully and see that the answer is "No" right at the start, before the question has been scrutinised without prejudice. He is not conscious of this mistake because he wears his belief. The eye holes are lenses of mere belief. Its extraordinarily difficult for him to take off the mask because everything by which he justifies himself psychologically and materially would be immediately removed. He would become a new man by removing his mask. His reputation, wealth probably lost. We wonder if he ever considered what would be gained in exchange.

So he misses The Mark, going round and round forever just believing in things and never knowing about anything. Or at least opening a door through which something important might be understood finally.

This is true too for organised religions, political party's, campaigns for social reform, planet saving charity and our academies of learning in general.

Religion and science are not the problem. Both are essential. The one to help transcend, for now and in safety, what science cannot tell us yet. The other as the vehicle for that eventual move beyond present myth - what we currently believe is real.

A conjunction of these opposites is essential for progress.

To divide them into a duality of conflict is to block progress. Thus we have the high priests and fundamentalists not only of religion. But just as dangerously of science. Remember the Scribes and the Pharisees.

And remember the maverick and heretic bringing a new message. Neither religion nor science are the problem. Believing we have the truth, is.

What is MeltFund?
Contact MeltFund 

Globalisation. Nationalisation. Individuation

The American citizen or any state citizen really is terrified of losing national identity.

We hear them.

Are they not worried about losing individual identity to the state already?